Advantages And Disadvantages Of Technology

Police Stun Guns and Patrol Car Video SurveillanceStudent s NameSchoolThe job of technology in dealing with execrables has long been debated upon . For instance , non bad(p) penalty via electric chair , gas chamber , and lethal stroke is criticized for its inhuman and barbaric nature . And yet , victims of wicked roughshod offenses and supporters of the death penalty find capital punishment as protection to the society (Koch 1985In the same way , the procedure of practice of law bewilder guns is viewed by those against it as supernumerary infliction of disarray and , therefore , inhuman . However wickedness victims intoxicate the intention of sandbag guns in capturing their attackers as beneficial and valuable . in like manner , the use of patrol gondola surveillance has been criticized as onslaught of privacy moreover individuals who yearns that the violation of their rights find justice see the use of patrol car surveillance as a valuable means to expediently suppressing the assailantsPolice Stun GunsBecause of the high crime rate in the country , many people meet succumbed to the inevitability of using constabulary bedaze guns to protect marooned civilians from attackers as well as to taking into custody the assailants with titular misuse against the latter . Stun guns use high voltage to stop an attacker by immobilizing him merely without inflicting drab or permanent damage (Eaton , 2007 ) Two mechanisms suspend this to come about : it confuses the sickening system by sending electric electric current finished that system and it overly causes the muscles of the body to contract quickly qualification them do a lot of work in a short amount of time depleting their energy do them uneffective to move (Beatty , 2007Those against the use of bewilder gu ns may bespeak that it is unnecessary infl! iction of combat injury against the suspected assailant .

However , the fact remains that criminals who attempt to flee also need to be make prisonerd for the benefit of the victim and this can be done with minimal harm against the assailant with the use of stun guns . Thus , stun guns do not only allow the victims to have their assailants captured but the offenders are also protected in the manner that the harm that they would receive is minimal as compared to organism subjected to shootingThose against the use of stun guns would also argue that this can be greatly step , if simplely legalized . Yes , abuse may be stand for especially with the background of police officers . In my opinion save , it is not the mere use of stun guns that should be attacked but the wide use of it without measures that would protect the other innocent individuals to whom it may be used against . Using stun guns to pacify a criminal and preventing him to flee is necessary but using the stun guns for opprobrious purposes is not . The society will feel safer with the familiarity that their protectors , the police officers , are armed with effective means to capture the criminals about themPatrol Car Video SurveillanceThe use of patrol car pictorial matter surveillance has been attacked because of its...If you want to get a full essay, direct it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper