A Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Research Essay -- Article Analysis

Described below is a critical appraisal of a soft hold by Lisa Booth using the frame-work suggested by Ryan, Coughlan and Cronin 2007 to establish its believability, robustness, credibleness and integrity (Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007). Qualitative research is regarded as an inductive process, which within raw(a) settings attempts to produce insights on the subjective experiences, meanings, practices and point of views of those involved (Craig & Smyth, 2007). The aim here was to investigate factors influencing the communication styles used by the radiographers, therefore, allowing a better consciousness to patient-centred care within diagnostic radiography. The title was well formulate and unambiguous, however, wherefore a more precise title of diagnostic radiographer-patient relationship was non selected is unclear as the study incorporated diagnostic radiographers only (Dawson, 2002). The article had appropriate citations except the researchers qualification and designat ion, which otherwise indicate the degree of knowledge in the field (Ryan et al, 2007). Included was the Keyword section facilitating retrieving of the search by those arouse (Hart, 2001). Its publication in a peer-reviewed journal allowed scrutiny from suitable experts, and then making more valid and original. In contrast, to a non peer-reviewed journal where heights chances of information being flawed cannot be denied (Holloway & Wheeler, 2002)? Losing the relevance of the information was not a threat as it was published within the optimum season (Hart, 2001). Abstract is a condensed version of the full report this was well formulated by using headings instead of single paragraph style, thus looked modify (Macnee, 2004). The purpose had c... ...the data did not involve member checking thus minify its robustness and enable to exclude researchers bias. Although a unalterable comparative method was evident in the discussion which improved the plausibleness of the final fin dings. Themes identified were well corroborated but not declared was anytime a point of theoretical saturation Thus, the published report was found to be particularly strong in the area of believability and dependability less(prenominal) strong in the area of transferability and is weak in the area of credibleness and confirmability, although, editorial limitations can be a barrier in providing a detailed account (Craig & Smyth, 2007 Ryan, Coughlan, & Cronin, 2007). Works CitedRyan, F., Couglan, M. & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2 qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738-744.