The Many Faces of Freedom? Essay -- Expository Exemplification Essays

The Many Face of independence? license is a concept that people are a great deal willing to die for and it is the cause of much fighting. However, fewer people ever outcry to dislike freedom. This raises an interesting question how can people fight everywhere what is generally considered to be a positive idea? Does this mean that psyche must be against freedom? The answer is that people cannot agree on what freedom is, thus numerous groups can claim to be for freedom while strongly disagreeing on the means by which to achieve it. These groups often argue vehemently and passionately, trying to convince the majority that their side is right. However, emotion is only mavin part of deciding who is more persuasive. I cracking two examples of disagreements regarding freedom, as proof that freedom is neither tangible, nor a alone(p) idea.An example of a disagreement about freedom between two bigger groups is offered in Michael Rossmans account of a student protest in The Weddin g Within the War. Feelings between students and the administration came to a read/write head in an argument regarding tables set up by student organizations to relate new members and pass out information. The administration first restricted the students rights by forcing them to move the tables from the heart of campus to the edge of campus, further from the majority of students. Then, a few years later, the students were told that they were not allowed to have the tables at all (102). Since their campus is a microcosm of the larger government of America, this limiting of their rights frightened them, causing them to react. As a result, they held a demonstration to make these concerns heard. Their main point, as presented in Catch-801 by Marvin Garson was that the University Administ... ...s to be a singular concept. The personal quality of an individuals definition of freedom is excessively the reason why the students were able to be more persuasive. Their writing contained a s ense of personal concern, that decisions made regarding freedom would impact each one of them individually. In contrast, political speeches, although concerned more with the majority, spoke more in terms of abstract freedom, which is much less persuasive.Works Cited Garson, Marvin. Catch-801. Takin It to the Streets. parvenue York. NY Oxford University Press, 1995. Reagan, Ronald. Freedom vs. Anarchy On Campus. Takin It to the Streets. New York. NY Oxford University Press, 1995. Rossman, Michael. The Wedding Within the War. Takin It to the Streets. New York. NY Oxford University Press, 1995. Roth, Philip. Goodbye, Columbus. New York. NY Bantam Books, 1968.